# Naïve and Viktor. Choose how the work gets done.

One config file provisions a company: infrastructure, payments, and governed agents behind policy checks. Compare that with Viktor, an AI employee for shared work in Slack and Microsoft Teams.

[All comparisons](https://viktor.com/compare) · [Autonomous company platforms](https://viktor.com/compare/autonomous-company-platforms)

Canonical page: https://viktor.com/compare/viktor-vs-naive

## Viktor vs Naïve

| Feature | Viktor | Competitor |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Surface | Slack and Microsoft Teams, in the channel where the work is already discussed. | Developer/founder tooling. CLI, config, coding agents. Not resident in team chat. |
| Works for | The whole team. Anyone can tag Viktor; context belongs to the workspace. | Founders and B2B software companies; claims 500+ deployments incl. Airwallex, HackerRank (vendor-stated). |
| Who owns the job | Reads the request, uses connected tools, produces the deliverable, and reports back in the thread. | Highest on the board in ambition: agents run coding, marketing, support 'recursively improving'. |
| Memory | Shared workspace context. What one person teaches Viktor can help the team. | Infrastructure-level, not teammate memory. |
| Tools | 9,800+ integrations, browser access, code execution, and published pages and apps. | Claims 10,000+ tools via one API and one balance. |
| Price shape | Shared workspace credits from $100/month, without a subscription for each teammate. | Check Naïve's current plans for pricing, included usage, and availability. |
| Best for | Ongoing team work across your connected tools. | You want infrastructure and agent configuration for an AI-centered business or application. |

## Choose Viktor

- You want to delegate work in Slack or Microsoft Teams.
- Your team needs shared context rather than isolated individual conversations.
- Your work spans several business tools and needs a finished deliverable.
- You prefer a managed employee with a shared workspace credit pool.

## Choose Naïve

- You want infrastructure and agent configuration for an AI-centered business or application.
- One config file provisions a company: infrastructure, payments, and governed agents behind policy checks.

## More from Autonomous company platforms

- [Naïve](https://viktor.com/compare/viktor-vs-naive): One config file provisions a company: infrastructure, payments, and governed agents behind policy checks.
- [Tycoon](https://viktor.com/compare/viktor-vs-tycoon): An AI manager that runs specialist agents alongside your human team on one org chart.
- [Polsia](https://viktor.com/compare/viktor-vs-polsia): Autonomous workflow execution pitched as the operating layer of a one-person company.

## Questions

### What is Naïve?

One config file provisions a company: infrastructure, payments, and governed agents behind policy checks.

### How does Naïve differ from Viktor?

Developer/founder tooling. CLI, config, coding agents. Not resident in team chat. Highest on the board in ambition: agents run coding, marketing, support 'recursively improving'. Viktor takes requests in Slack and Microsoft Teams and works across the team's connected tools.

### When should I choose Naïve?

You want infrastructure and agent configuration for an AI-centered business or application. One config file provisions a company: infrastructure, payments, and governed agents behind policy checks.

### Is Naïve part of the same family as other tools here?

Naïve belongs to Autonomous company platforms in this catalog. Its tool type is Work OS. The family groups related products; the tool type describes what this product does.

Product information: https://usenaive.ai